From: Robert M. Blumm, MA,
PA-C, DFAAPA :
Benefit From Over-Worked
Residents?
by Jeff Reinke
A recent study shows that a
2003 reform of the length of resident on-duty hours could be connected to an
increase in the rate of perioperative complications for patients treated for
hip fractures. Among other things, this reform limited the resident workweek to
80 hours. This timeline corresponds to an increasing rate of worse outcomes
seen in teaching hospitals, according to a study published in the September
2009 issue of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS).
"The data suggests a
statistically significant increase in selected complications after
implementation of the duty-hour reforms in teaching hospitals. This may go
against common assumptions regarding outcomes as they relate to the length of
resident hours," said study lead author James M. Browne, MD, an orthopedic
surgeon currently completing a fellowship in Rochester, MN. The study was
performed at Duke University Medical Center.
On July 1, 2003, The
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education implemented a resident
duty-hour reform for all medical and surgical residents in the U.S. Dr. Browne
and his co-authors at Duke reviewed data from teaching and non-teaching
hospitals for 48,430 patients treated for hip fractures in a nationwide
inpatient sample database, reviewing groups from 2001 and 2002 before resident
duty-hour reform, and from 2004 and 2005 after the reform.
This study sought to measure
changes in the rate of patient death or resulting in-hospital complications
since this reform. No increase in death rates was found, but increases in
pneumonia, hematoma, transfusion, renal complications and non-routine discharge
did occur.
In addition to an increase
in the rate of medical complications, the study also notes an increase in
length and cost of stay in teaching hospitals. Most would tend to agree with
Dr. Browne's assumptions. "I think it would be premature for a patient to
make any medical decisions based on the results of this study. Remember, this
is limited to hip fracture outcomes tracked during a limited time period and
does not take into account any improvements in delivery of care since 2005.
"Surgeons and
policy-makers need more data to understand the full impact of these duty hour
changes on our patients. As we consider any kind of reform, we must continue to
keep the safe delivery of care that results in successful patient outcomes as
our number one priority," said Dr. Browne.
It appears to be a thin line
for teaching hospitals to walk. Although the benefits, both short and
long-term, could be significant for repealing these reforms and getting as much
as possible out of residents, the goal is to preserve these entry level
surgeons, not burn them out. However, with an aging population and collection
of baby-boomers hitting a period of their lives where they will need greater
healthcare, are hospitals stretching resources too far by not asking for more
hours out of residents?
Orthopedic procedures, one
would assume, will continue to be in great demand as a surging population
encounters more back and joint issues that may require a surgical fix not too
far in the future. The ability to not only attend to this growing patient
group, but ensure their procedures are done as well as possible, not only
impacts the vitally basic elements of patient health and well-being, but the
underlying principle of containing hospital costs and healthcare provider time
in dealing with related negative outcomes.
Recent Comments